Glomalin and Conservation in Humboldt County The 1996 discovery of the soil glue glomalin is changing our understanding of the impact of elevated carbon dioxide, while giving important clues to forest health, watersheds, revegetation, wildfire and carbon sequestration. Here I share what I have found so others may read and draw their own conclusions, and relate it to my own experience, Humboldt County issues and stories from the news.

Friday, August 13, 2004

Hikers help spread sudden oak death 

After writing comments on plans for HRSP, Headwaters, and King Range I came to the realization we need biological safe zones free from regular human activity. Recreation is overstated in many areas and a threat to natural systems. The same thinking that led to unlimited take in the past is now unlimited usage for recreation. This calls for a rewriting of the rules for uses for public lands. In the past I was primarily concerned with surface erosion and exotic plants although Port Orford cedar blight has been known for at least a decade. I suspect a new generation of hiking shoes could be developed that prevent spread of the disease. My problems with the physical damage from bikes and horses remain in steep areas of mobile soil. Remember, disturbing the soil destroys glomalin further weakening the soil structure and unleashing silt as sediment and dust until that soil is reincorporated into the living soil system.
The strength of fire as a disease retardant has to be looked at closely because fire is now seen as an essential management tool. If control burns to reduce fuel load threats can be focused on disease prone areas we may have a tool for accommodating this pest, and it may be relegated to the known pathogens without fear of mass die-off. Either way will cause some erosion. The Mattole has a busy fire history since 1950 and it may help to look for problems in older unburnt areas.
http://www.newscientist.com/news/print.jsp?id=ns99996257
Hikers help spread sudden oak death
10:29 10 August 04
NewScientist.com news serviceResearchers have confirmed suspicions that trail users such as hikers and mountain bikers are helping to spread a disease that is devastating Californian forests.
The researchers found the pathogen causing sudden oak death was prevalent along trails through otherwise uninfected forests, but almost absent in soil samples taken two metres away from the trail.
They also found that the disease was more widespread in parks heavily used for hiking, mountain biking and horse riding than in less-visited areas. Previous work has shown that people can carry the pathogen on their shoes, but this is the first study to provide evidence of the consequences.
"Humans are moving the pathogen around, and the result seems to be higher levels of the disease," says J Hall Cushman, a biologist at Sonoma State University in California. He presented the data, collected over the last two years, at the Ecological Society of America conference in Portland, Oregon last week.
Difficult questions
Sudden oak death, caused by the fungus-like pathogen Phytopthora ramorum, is sweeping through forests in coastal California. It has also been detected in the UK and several other European countries.
The pathogen kills some oak species, and causes a non-fatal leaf disease in many other plants such as rhododendrons and California bay. Researchers suspect the disease is also spread by water and by other animals.
Cushman says the results pose difficult questions for land managers in California,
where outdoor recreation is hugely popular. If managers do nothing, they may be criticised for not preventing the spread the disease.
Restricting trail access during wet seasons, when the pathogen is most active, would probably be most effective, but would also be unpopular and hard to enforce.
Another possible control method is to ensure visitors clean their shoes and bike tires before and after visits. The National Park Service plans to test this method this winter.

Wild fires
The need for action was highlighted by another study presented at the same conference. This predicted that in heavily infected areas the disease will kill up to up to 69% of a dominant native tree species, coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia), within five years.
A dramatic protective measure against the disease was revealed in a third study presented at the conference – wildfires. "We almost never see infections in areas that burned" since 1950, says Max Moritz of the University of California, Berkeley.
Periodic wildfires are natural occurrences, but managers have historically suppressed them. Researchers are now working to discover why fires should have such a long-lasting effect.
The news that people and fire affect the spread of sudden oak death matches the experience of Patrick Robards, a ranger at China Camp State Park. The park is a notorious hotspot for sudden oak death that gets 300,000 visitors a year.
Robards conducted controlled burns as part of the park management regime, but stopped in 1999 due to lack of funds. He estimates that in burned areas fewer than 5% of oaks show signs of the disease - in areas that did not burn, up to 90% of oaks are dying or already dead.
Mike Faden, Portland
Comments: Post a Comment

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?